🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated one MEP behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various politicians to mimic the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, further countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.